The Downers Grove village council is debating a plan for a new Walgreen’s to be built in the southwest corner of town, a project opposed by neighbors and rejected by the village Plan Commission.
Under the proposal, the 15,000-square-foot Walgreen’s would be built in an unincorporated area at the northwest corner of 63rd Street and Woodward Avenue.
Because the area is unincorporated, Chicago real-estate firm Draper and Kramer, working on behalf the pharmacy, asked the council to annex the property, consolidate a handful of residential lots and zone the area to allow commercial business. They are also asking the council for a special use permit, which would allow a drive-through prescription pick-up window.
“First and foremost, I support this,” said Commissioner Sean Patrick Durkin, who said the village could bring in up to $100,000 a year in revenue. “I see this as an economic opportunity for us to redevelop the north side of 63rd Street when there’s a (nearby) shopping center that’s having financial difficulties.”
Durkin was the most outspoken in his support, but his sentiments were echoed to varying degrees by the other members of the council. The village Plan Commission rejected the proposal in January on a 7 to 1 advisory vote.
“Sometimes the Plan Commission recommends something and we agree with it, sometimes the Plan Commission recommends something and we disagree with it,” Mayor Martin Tully said. “Downers Grove was founded a long time ago and it is not a cornfield (anymore). We have to deal with a landlocked community … It almost requires some encroachment on residential areas.”
Residents appearing before the council on Tuesday presented a petition signed by an estimated 280 people, requesting the proposal be rejected.
The proximity to both Downers Grove South High School and Indian Trail Elementary would pose a risk to children walking to school, in addition to the degradation of property values and an increase in noise and traffic, they argued. Storm water flooding could also crop up, they say.
“By their own admission they say it’s going to add 1,300 (cars) driving in and out a day,” said Dee Gordon, of the 6200 block of Pershing Avenue. “We’re concerned about safety because we have children walking to elementary and high school.”
An analysis conducted by nearby residents concluded there are 28 pharmacies within a five-mile radius, with 18 pharmacies open within a three-mile radius. They asked if there was really need for another. The underutilized Meadowbrook Shopping Center across the street from the proposed location was also mentioned as a potential home for the store. There’s also a shuttered former Walgreen’s just a short distance away in Woodridge, they say.
Some area residents say they are concerned their neighborhood will end up looking like some of the older strip malls dotting Ogden Avenue.
“It’s apparent they only care about money, because if you drive down Ogden Avenue, it looks like garbage,” said Michelle Schelli, of the 6200 block of Pershing Avenue, who said she’s concerned the same future is destined for her neighborhood.
“Let’s fix what you’ve done and not destroy another neighborhood,” said Patty Gruber, also of the 6200 block of Pershing, who suggested the store could be put in an existing empty location.
Members of the village council said, before any plans move forward their traffic, safety and noise concerns must be addressed. They also noted developers have pledged to build a sidewalk along the north side of the road, where there currently isn’t one. Additionally a green-space buffer would be built between existing homes and the backside of the proposed store.
“This is a big deal. It’s a big change in the neighborhood. And I think change is sometimes met with resistance,” said Commissioner Geoff Neustadt.













@mikeindg I totally agree with you! You would think the planning commission would be the vote that counts when it comes to planning and development of the area.
I live in unincorporated Downers Grove not far from the proposed area that Walgreen’s want to build this huge and obtrusive building. I don’t have any children. I pay taxes for district 58 and district 99. I am a patron of Downers Grove stores and pay taxes on the goods I buy.
My neighbors and I are trying to save our neighborhood from becoming another Ogden Avenue. I don’t understand in these economic times why we need to destroy a residential area to build yet another pharmacy. There are hundreds of available retail spaces for sale and lease in Downers Grove. Why don’t we fill these vacant and already commercially zoned areas before destroying homes, mature trees and lots and building something new!
Our safety concerns include children that play outside on residential roads and walk to nearby schools. Yes, these children know how to cross a road, but the reality is that drivers do not obey the speed limit signs, the stop signs, the blind hill signs or the children at play signs. When you introduce a commercial building into a residential area you are increasing traffic and congestion to roads that are not built for this type of traffic not to mention the increase in safety concerns to our children and all residents that live in the area. Do we really need to put lives at risk for a little more tax revenue? I believe you cannot put a price tag on safety and lives!
I’m wondering why we even have a planning commission of the village council can just say “We don’t care”?
It will generate property taxes for the school district. It will generate sales tax revenue for the village. Why should everyone else with no kids continue to have to foot the bill for education because parents don’t want to teach kids how to cross streets safely?